By: Hussein Omar

The postponement of the anticipated Paris meeting between representatives of the Autonomous Administration and the Al-Julani-led government marks a critical moment for political reassessment — not only for the parties directly involved but also for regional and international actors who are reevaluating their positions on the increasingly complex Syrian file. This delay was not coincidental. It comes amid a growing number of UN and media reports exposing serious human rights violations committed by Al-Julani’s government in the coastal region and Suwayda. A particularly striking report by Reuters revealed the emergence of a “deep state” over the past six months, allegedly headed by members of Al-Julani’s inner circle — with strong indications that his father is playing a key role. This shadow network reportedly seizes public and private funds without any legal or institutional oversight, in a display of corruption reminiscent of authoritarian regimes. What’s even more alarming is the resurgence of sectarian massacres, documented and now under serious review in major international capitals. These developments have triggered growing calls for accountability and justice. In Washington, the statements made by Tom Barrack — which appeared more like public endorsements of Al-Julani than objective assessments — did not go unnoticed. Sources indicate that the U.S. State Department has reprimanded Barrack, prompting a visible shift in his tone over the past few days. The open support for Al-Julani’s project seems to be eroding under the weight of undeniable facts. Meanwhile, the Autonomous Administration has shown political maturity by refusing to rush into negotiations with a government that lacks legitimacy and stands accused of human rights abuses. Al-Julani’s administration does not represent the Syrian state; rather, it embodies a narrow ideological agenda rooted in Salafist and Islamist currents — a foundation incapable of supporting a truly inclusive national project. The coming weeks could prove especially challenging for Al-Julani’s camp. U.S. sanctions are likely to be extended, and even former President Donald Trump — despite his ambiguous rhetoric — appears to be reconsidering his position in light of escalating instability and the risk of renewed chaos. On the ground, fears are mounting about the reemergence of ISIS, fueled by a fragile security environment largely attributed to Al-Julani’s misgovernance. Meanwhile, Turkey’s recent threats seem to be more rhetorical than operational, as Ankara faces mounting internal and regional difficulties, particularly regarding its relationship with Israel. These complications appear to have driven Turkey to push Al-Julani toward aggressive and reckless actions in the coastal region and Suwayda. In light of these developments, it is becoming increasingly clear that the postponement of the Paris meeting is not merely a scheduling issue — but a turning point. It may signal a broader shift that reshuffles the cards and places Al-Julani’s government under greater international scrutiny. The era of unchecked impunity may be drawing to a close.